Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Palin


Kliphnote:  Why the criticism of Palin?
 Some people are saying she should have come out
earlier about the shooting.
Some have said she should have come out for more gun control.
She holds NO office!

Did the VP or any congress member make a speech?
How much has Obama said?
Why Palin? 
Why are the liberals so afraid of Palin?
Oh, they call her a moron, a dope, stupid, a fool and more.
Who cares? 
She holds NO office! 

When you have a VP and many congress members who
are a laughing stock.

The left has to be deathly afraid of  Palin (for what ever reason),
why else would they be talking about her all the time.
That only makes them look foolish.
Remember:  She holds NO office! 
OMG!

1 comment:

Kliph said...

Can't win. Ever network.
They complain when she doesn't
say anything. And they complain
when she does.
Unbelievable!!!

"Perhaps she didn't know of the context of that phrase," NBC correspondent and MSNBC anchor Andrea Mitchell said.

"Maybe she was ignorant of it, to give her the benefit of the doubt," Mitchell added.

Alan Dershowitz defends Palin's use of "blood libel."
---------------------------------
Analysis: Palin Plays the Victim Card (CBS)
---------------------------------
BOTTOM LINE: Sarah Palin, once again, has found a way to become part of the story. And she may well face further criticism for the timing and scope of her remarks. She is already taking heat for her use of the term "blood libel" (see today's Tweets). In her video she notes, “President Obama and I may not agree on everything, but I know he would join me in affirming the health of our democratic process.” (ABC)